<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flex Based Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.everythingflex.com/2007/11/27/flex-based-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.everythingflex.com/2007/11/27/flex-based-office/</link>
	<description>News and Information about Adobe Flex &#38; Adobe AIR by Rich Tretola</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pan69</title>
		<link>http://blog.everythingflex.com/2007/11/27/flex-based-office/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>pan69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.everythingflex.com/2007/11/27/flex-based-office/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>I do not understand Adobe's motivations behind the visual style of their applications (also used in Buzzword). Its just plain dirty. They're using the same look for their Spry examples, what a blunder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand Adobe&#8217;s motivations behind the visual style of their applications (also used in Buzzword). Its just plain dirty. They&#8217;re using the same look for their Spry examples, what a blunder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
